Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/108077
Type of publication: research article
Type of publication (PDB): Straipsnis Clarivate Analytics Web of Science / Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science (S1)
Field of Science: Ekonomika / Economics (S004)
Author(s): Meyer-Aurich, Andreas;Karatay, Yusuf Nadi;Nausėdienė, Aušra;Kirschke, Dieter
Title: Effectivity and cost efficiency of a tax on nitrogen fertilizer to reduce GHG emissions from agriculture
Is part of: Atmosphere. Basel : MDPI, 2020, vol. 11, iss. 6
Extent: p. 1-9
Date: 2020
Keywords: Nitrogen tax;Mitigation of greenhouse gases;Greenhouse gas mitigation cost
Abstract: The use of nitrogen (N) fertilizer substantially contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to N2O emissions from agricultural soils and energy-intensive fertilizer manufacturing. Thus, a reduction of mineral N fertilizer use can contribute to reduced GHG emissions. Fertilizer tax is a potential instrument to provide incentives to apply less fertilizer and contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions. This study provides model results based on a production function analysis from field experiments in Brandenburg and Schleswig-Holstein, with respect to risk aversion by calculating certainty equivalents for different levels of risk aversion. The model results were used to identify effective and cost-efficient options considering farmers’ risk aversion to reduce N fertilizer, and to compare the potential and cost of GHG mitigation with different N fertilizer tax schemes. The results show that moderate N tax levels are effective in reducing N fertilizer levels, and thus, in curbing GHG emissions at costs below 100 €/t CO2eq for rye, barley and canola. However, in wheat production, N tax has limited effects on economically optimal N use due to the effects of N fertilizer on crop quality, which affect the sale prices of wheat. The findings indicate that the level of risk aversion does not have a consistent impact on the reduction of N fertilizer with a tax, even though the level of N fertilizer use is generally lower for risk-averse agents. The differences in N fertilizer response might have an impact on the relative advantage of different crops, which should be taken into account for an effective implementation of a tax on N fertilizer
Internet: https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/108077/2/ISSN2073-4433_2020_V_11_6.PG_1-9.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/108077
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060607
Affiliation(s): Bioekonomikos plėtros fakultetas
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:1. Straipsniai / Articles
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml7.54 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record
Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats
Export to Other Non-XML Formats


CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

42
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Download(s)

10
checked on Jun 6, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons