Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/1051
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Vadyba / Management (S003)
Author(s): Vveinhardt, Jolita
Title: Nepotizmo vertinimo dichotomija : socialinės ir etinės dimensijos
Other Title: Nepotism evaluation dichotomy: social and ethical dimensions
Is part of: Organizacijų vadyba : sisteminiai tyrimai. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 64 (2012)
Extent: p. 123-134
Date: 2012
Keywords: Favoritizmas;Korupcija;Mobingas;Nepotizmas;Seksizmas;Favoritism;Corruption;Mobbing;Nepotism;Sexism
Abstract: Straipsnyje nepotizmas analizuojamas kaip bendrai žmonių socialinius santykius lydintis reiškinys. Aptariama termino vartosena nacionaliniame kontekste – kaip vienas iš korupcinių santykių viešajame sektoriuje požymių. Formuluojama nuostata, kad nepotizmas pasireiškia tiek viešajame, tiek privačiajame sektoriuose, o jo pasekmės – panašiai žalingos. Nors pirminė nepotizmo termino reikšmė yra siejama su artimųjų, giminių įdarbinimu naudojantis tarnybine padėtimi, vartosenos ribos plečiasi ir apima žymiai platesnį kontekstą
It is emphasized that nepotism in the culture of business organizations is not less widespread than in public sector. In business organizations there is no steady opinion on whether nepotism is a purely negative phenomenon when forming organization’s staff, efforts to find pragmatic, beneficial aspects for business organizations are made. Attention is paid to ethical evaluation dichotomy. Subject of the research: nepotism evaluation dichotomy. Aim of the research: to analyze nepotism evaluation dichotomy from social and ethical aspects. Lithuania focuses on the problems of nepotism in the public sector to examine the intensity of the phenomenon often in conjunction with a historical-systematic heritage. Less attention has ethical and economic aspects of the phenomenon in the private sector. Nepotism comes from social relations that have naturally formed in different groups, group collective selfdefense mechanism that encourages defending and protecting the interests of its representatives. Tribal, family, local criteria in modern societies are supplemented by many other criteria that are based on indirect monetary benefit exchange that allow forming a rather closed clan. When evaluating in the public context, nepotism ethically can be considered as a certain social dysfunction, discrimination. Nepotism is characteristic to many socio-cultures, although it manifests itself differently depending on the traditions and civil, moral maturity of the society. For this reason ethical dichotomy of nepotism evaluation is selective. Social nature of the phenomenon influences ethical evaluation, positive treatment of the phenomenon in business sector promotes social tolerance to nepotism in the public sector. [...]
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/1051
https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/1051/1/ISSN1392-1142_2012_N_64.PG_123-134.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/1051
https://doi.org/10.7220/MOSR.1392.1142.2012.64.8
Affiliation(s): Ekonomikos ir vadybos fakultetas
Vadybos katedra
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai / Management of Organizations: Systematic Research 2012, nr. 64
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml11.63 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

290
checked on Feb 11, 2020

Download(s)

284
checked on Feb 11, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.