Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/1032
Type of publication: Straipsnis kitose duomenų bazėse / Article in other databases (S4)
Field of Science: Psichologija / Psychology (S006)
Author(s): Endriulaitienė, Auksė;Medišauskaitė, Asta
Title: Teisingumas darbe ir socialinė identifikacija su grupe viešojo ir privataus sektoriaus organizacijose
Other Title: Justice at work and social identification with group in private and public sector
Is part of: Organizacijų vadyba : sisteminiai tyrimai. Kaunas : Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla, 64 (2012)
Extent: p. 41-52
Date: 2012
Keywords: Suvoktas organizacinis teisingumas;Socialinė identifikacija su grupe;Viešojo ir privataus sektoriaus organizacijos;Perceived organizational justice;Social identification with group;Public and private sector
Abstract: Straipsnyje nagrinėjama skirtingų suvokiamo organizacinio teisingumo aspektų reikšmė socialinei identifikacijai su darbo grupe viešojo ir privataus sektoriaus organizacijose ir aptariami gauti rezultatai
Perceived justice at work is important in creating healthy psychological climate in every organization (DeConinck, Stilwell, 2009; Moorman, Niehoff, Organ, 1993; Elovainio, Kivimäki, Vahtera, 2002; Liljegren, Ekberg, 2009; Brown, Berson, 2003). One of the aspects linked with justice at work is group relations. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of different components of justice on social identification with group in private and public sector. Data consisted of 330 participants from various organizations in Kaunas (45,5 % of respondents were from public and 54,2 % from private organizations). The results revealed that employees from public institutions considered their organizations as more fair. Even though, these employees evaluated the distributed (t = 2,019, p = 0,044) and interactional justice better (t = 3,268, p = 0,005) than employees from private organizations, there was found no significant difference in perception of procedural justice (t = 1,328, p = 0,185). When comparing social identification with group, it was found that respondents from public sector identified with work group stronger (t = 2,859; p = 0,005). In addition, the results showed that respondents who perceived their organization as more fair identified with social work group stronger in both sectors. Nevertheless, different components of organizational justice were important in predicting social identification in public and private institutions. Interactional justice was a predictor of social identification with group in public institutions (F = 11,705; R2 = 0,194), whereas distributed and procedural justice prognosticated social identification in private organizations (F = 32,375; R2 = 0,358). These results could be explained by formal constrains. Public sector is characterized by more formal rules because of which the decisions and processes are perceived as more transparent and fair. [...]
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/1032
https://www.vdu.lt/cris/bitstream/20.500.12259/1032/1/ISSN1392-1142_2012_N_64.PG_41-52.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/1032
https://doi.org/10.7220/MOSR.1392.1142.2012.64.3
Affiliation(s): Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai / Management of Organizations: Systematic Research 2012, nr. 64
Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml12.26 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Aug 16, 2019

Download(s)

38
checked on Aug 16, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.