Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/36580
Type of publication: Magistro darbas / Master thesis
Field of Science: Teisė / Law
Author(s): Valatkevičiūtė, Ieva
Title: Ar pagrindinis subjektas vertinant Europos arešto orderio proporcingumą turėtų būti tik jį išduodanti valstybė?
Other Title: Whether the main subject in evaluating the proportionality of the European arrest warrant should be the state issuing it?
Extent: 44 p.
Date: 7-Jun-2018
Event: Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas. Teisės fakultetas
Keywords: Europos arešto orderis;Propocingumo principas;Išduodančioji ir vykdančioji valstybė;European Arrest Warrant;Proportionality;Issuing and the executing member states
Abstract: Darbe siekiama atskleisti, ar pagrindinis subjektas vertinant Europos arešto orderio proporcingumą turėtų būti tik jį išduodanti valstybė. Siekiant atsakyti į iškeltą klausimą, analizuojamas Europos arešto orderio proporcingumo principas, jo vertinimas bei svarba, nagrinėjama kada yra laikomas tokios priemonės netinkamas įvertinimas ir vykdymas.
This thesis intends to reveal whether the main subject in evaluating the proportionality of the European Arrest Warrant should only be the state issuing it. In order to answer the posed question, the principle of proportionality of the European Arrest Warrant, its evaluation and importance are analysed. The present paper also studies cases when evaluation and execution of the European Arrest Warrant are considered to be ineligible. It is important to examine and show what the obligation of the Member States is, when the criminal principle, human rights and freedoms are violated. The analysis of this problem is based on both, the Lithuanian and the European legal acts and courts’ practice.
Internet: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/36580
Appears in Collections:2018 m. (TF mag.)

Files in This Item:
ieva.valatkeviciutė md .pdf624.76 kBAdobe PDF   Restricted AccessView/Open   Request a copy

Show full item record

Page view(s)

56
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Download(s)

24
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.