Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/44132
Type of publication: Straipsnis konferencijos medžiagoje Clarivate Analytics Web of Science ar/ir Scopus / Article in Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or Scopus DB conference proceedings (P1a)
Field of Science: Informatika / Computer science (N009)
Author(s): Fomin, Vladislav V;de Vries, Henk J
Title: How Balanced Is Balanced Enough? Case Studies of Stakeholders’ (Under-) Representation in Standardization Process
Is part of: SIIT2009 : 6th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, September 8-10, 2009 Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo : IEICE Communication Society
Extent: p. 99-112
Date: 2009
Keywords: Existing research emphasizes the far-reaching effects of formal international standardization and recognizes the importance of involving the key stakeholders in the process of developing standards. However, to date no systematic assessment has been made on how well competing interests of different stakeholders are balanced in standards development. In this work we fill the gap in the literature by reporting on actual causes and effects of stakeholdersí under-representation in standardization process. We derive the findings from four case studies of standards development. Our findings confirm the earlier literature in that there is a clear causal effect between stakeholders under-representation and problems in terms of quality of standardization outputs. New contributions to extant literature are made, and managerial implications for remedying unbalanced stakeholder representation are drawn;Stakeholder;Interests;Representation;Analysis;Case study;Standards;Standardization
ISBN: 9784885522406
Internet: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/44132
Affiliation(s): Informatikos fakultetas
Taikomosios informatikos katedra
Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas
Appears in Collections:Universiteto mokslo publikacijos / University Research Publications

Files in This Item:
marc.xml7.45 kBXMLView/Open

MARC21 XML metadata

Show full item record

Page view(s)

122
checked on Nov 2, 2019

Download(s)

10
checked on Nov 2, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.