Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35802
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Mujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira
Title: The supreme court of Canada and the offender’s right to be transferred to serve his sentence in Canada: interpreting the international transfer of offenders act in light of Canada’s national and international human rights obligations
Is part of: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 2013 vol. 6, iss. 2, p.
Date: 2013
Keywords: Supreme Court;Canada;Transfer;Offender;Rights;Rehabilitation
Abstract: In September 2013 in the case of Divito v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) the Supreme Court of Canada dealt with the issue of whether section 6(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Charter, which grants Canadians the right to enter Canada was violated in a case where the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness declined to consent to the transfer of a Canadian citizen to serve his sentence in Canada where the sentencing state had consented to the transfer. Another issue was whether sections 8(1) and 10(1)(a) and 10(2)(a) of the International Transfer of Offenders Act, which granted the Minister the discretion to consent or not to consent to the transfer, were contrary to section 6(1) of the Charter. In resolving the above issues, the Court referred to its earlier jurisprudence, academic publications and international law. Although the Court agreed with the government that the appeal was moot because the appellant had left the USA by the time it was heard, it held that it retained “a residual discretion to decide the merits of a moot appeal if the issues raised are of public importance” and that this case was one of public importance because “[t]he issues are likely to recur in the future and there is some uncertainty resulting from conflicting decisions in the Federal Court.” The purpose of this article is to highlight the interpretative tools invoked by the court and the implications of the judgement.
Internet: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2013-0013
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35802
Appears in Collections:Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 2013, vol. 6, iss. 2

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Download(s)

32
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.