Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35789
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Ervo, Laura
Title: Plea bargaining as an example of the recent changes in the finnish criminal procedural paradigm
Is part of: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 2014 vol. 7, iss. 1, p. 97-112
Date: 2014
Keywords: Conflict resolution;Criminal proceedings;Plea bargaining;Material truth;Party autonomy;Procedural truth;Sanction mechanism
Abstract: In Finland, a government bill on plea bargaining is now at the parliament. In Estonia, Norway, Denmark, Germany and Latvia they have adopted similar systems already. In Sweden and Iceland plea bargaining is not possible. As a procedural instrument, plea bargaining is something quite new in Europe, and in the Baltic and in the Nordic countries. How does it fit into our systems and into our way of thinking? If we look at the current trends in criminal proceedings fairness, procedural justice, conflict resolution, negotiated law, pragmatically acceptable compromise, procedural truth, party autonomy, court service, communication and interaction are good examples of the topics which are currently being discussed. All these examples indicate that the criminal jurisdiction has become more communal. It has even been said that criminal proceedings have recently become closer civil proceedings, which seems to be quite true. Still, efficiency plays a major role in European adjudication thanks to economic crisis and lack of resources. How to understand the role of plea bargaining in this set? At least the legislator has pointed out the efficiency, the appropriate allocation of resources and the simplifying the criminal proceedings when suggesting adopting the plea bargaining in Finland. The novelty has not been put into philosophical context or into the systemic context of criminal proceedings. It looks like the legislator adopts some single instruments from the foreign legal orders if they seem to fit well into legislators’ puzzle to intensify the proceedings and to save the state money. However, there seem to be more coherent trends behind all of that as well - namely, the change of paradigm.
Internet: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2014-0006
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35789
Appears in Collections:Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 2014, vol. 7, iss. 1

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Download(s)

48
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons