Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35726
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Moisejevas, Raimundas
Title: Predatory pricing: a framework for analysis
Is part of: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 2017 vol. 10, iss. 1, p. 124-155
Date: 2017
Keywords: Abuse of dominance;Predatory pricing;Predatory intent;Objective justifications;Recoupment of losses;Pricing below costs;Average avoidable costs
Abstract: One of the key principles of EU Competition law is a prohibition of the abuse of a dominant position established in the Article 102 of the TFEU. Predatory pricing is one of the forms of the abuse of dominant position. To decide whether the dominant undertaking has referred to predatory pricing it is necessary to check several elements: costs and prices of the dominant undertaking; the possibility to recoup losses; intent; and objective justifications. The Court of Justice, the European Commission and competition institutions in most member states perform extensive analysis of a relationship between costs and prices of a dominant undertaking while dealing with cases on predatory pricing. However, we believe that competition authorities should pay more attention to evaluation and to whether pricing will cause elimination of competitors and damage to consumers. This article critically reviews the framework of the analysis of predatory pricing in the practice of the Court of Justice and the European Commission.
Internet: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2017-0005
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/35726
Appears in Collections:Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 2017, vol. 10, iss. 1

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Download(s)

44
checked on Oct 13, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons