Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33871
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTrimakas, Ramūnas
dc.contributor.authorMeilius, Kazimieras
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-28T09:17:44Z
dc.date.available2017-02-28T09:17:44Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn2335-8785
dc.identifier.urihttps://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/33871
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33871-
dc.description.abstractAsmens statusas – tai kompleksinė sąvoka, apimanti kelis dėmenis, dažniausiai jis aiškinamas kaip pareigų ir teisių visuma. Asmens statuso suvokimas ir apibūdinimas nėra statiškas, jis laipsniškai kinta. Pastaraisiais dešimtmečiais statusas siejamas su asmenine gerove bei finansine galia, tuo tarpu moraliniai ir etiniai statuso aspektai tampa vis mažiau reikšmingi. Statuso sampratos kaita yra glaudžiai susijusi su pokyčiais – transformacijos procesais visuomenėje. Moralinis reliatyvizmas, susilpnėję ar nutrūkę bendruomeniniai ir šeimyniniai saitai, asmeninio nesaugumo jausmas žymi suirusią socialinių ir kultūrinių koordinačių sistemą. Šiuolaikinis asmens statuso suvokimas yra veikiamas sisteminės krizės, būdingos tiek Vakarams, tiek buvusio sovietinio lagerio šalims.lt_LT
dc.description.abstractCurrent article deals with the social status theories and analyses the shifting concept of personal status. Social conversions directly affect the understanding and definition of personal status. Part of contemporary authors considers this multiple process to be a result of modern crisis both in the Western democracies as well as in the post-Soviet countries. They criticize the devastating effect that secularization has on the conventional way of life and interpersonal relationship without positive alternative. Cultural and social deviations as a forthcoming norm, fragmentation or even collapse of the traditional communities, decline of the family institute, alienation and estrangement of an individual are the social phenomena that were identified and widely analyzed in the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century. Consequently, social status was started to identify with welfare, power and good/profitable position and vice versa – unsatisfactory status or status publicly recognized as “mean” is perceived as a social stigma. The conception that treated personal status as the whole of multisided obligations and responsibility among individuals was rejected as inadmissible. [...]en_US
dc.language.isolten_US
dc.relation.ispartofSoter : religijos mokslo žurnalas, 2007, nr. 24(52), p. 75-88lt_LT
dc.rightsSutarties data 2006-10-02, nr. LLTI-00001, laisvai prieinamas internetelt_LT
dc.subjectAsmuolt_LT
dc.subjectRevoliucijalt_LT
dc.subjectSisteminė krizėlt_LT
dc.subjectIndividualen_US
dc.subjectRevolutionen_US
dc.subjectRoleen_US
dc.titleŠiuolaikinė asmens statuso transformacija: sisteminės krizės paradigma ir atsako paieškalt_LT
dc.title.alternativeContemporary transformation of personal status: paradigm of systemic crisis and the quest for solutionen_US
dc.typeStraipsnis / Article
dc.subject.udc1 Filosofija / Philosophy
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:SOTER: religijos mokslo žurnalas / SOTER: Journal of Religious Science 2007, nr. 24(52)
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

90
checked on Dec 9, 2019

Download(s)

86
checked on Dec 9, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.