Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33859
Type of publication: Straipsnis / Article
Author(s): Stauskas, Vladas
Title: Kultūros paveldo ir naujosios architektūros santykis mažosiose gyvenvietėse
Other Title: The relationship between cultural heritage and contemporary architecture in small settlements
Is part of: Meno istorija ir kritika, 2005, nr. 1, p. 16-23
Date: 2005
Keywords: Cultural property;Kultūros vertybės;Architektūra;Miestai ir miesteliai;Architecture;Cities and towns
Abstract: It is common to analyze the issue of the relationship between new architecture and architectural heritage with regard to the old town of large cities. However, the issue is no less present in small settlements and villages. It is most apparent, in particular, in those areas where ethnic architecture has remained due to survival and preservation. The settlements of this kind are situated mainly in the national and regional parks. Moreover, these areas have the most spectacular nature landscapes. These areas face the pressure of new hotels, new private villas and other tourism-oriented architecture. Neringa, situated in the Curonian Spit National Park, has been chosen as a research site for analyzing the issue of harmonizing architecture. The aspects of interaction in architectural are as follows: 1) location; 2) volumes and forms; 3) building materials; 4) colours. The article gives both the positive and negative examples from the period of 1960 to 2004. It also stresses that architecture and its character are part of national culture. Culture warrants the preservation of national identity in the current context of Europeanization and globalization. The cultural relicts of the ancient Curonian tribes from the Lithuanian seaside are one of such preserving elements, which represent the ancient marine culture of all the Balts (Lithuanians, Latvians, Prussians).
Architektūros paveldo ir naujosios architektūros ryšiai miestų senamiesčiuose – populiari ir daug kartų gvildenta tiek teorijoje, tiek praktikoje tema. Deja, ji vis dar „amžina“ ir be pabaigos... Tuo tarpu panašiai problemai miesteliuose ar dar išlikusiuose etniniuose kaimuose dėmesio beveik neskiriama. Gaila, nes būtent čia kultūros paveldo registre esantys architektūros objektai dažniausiai yra mediniai. Jie nyksta greičiau, negu, pvz., mūrinės bažnyčios ar dvarų rūmai. Kita problema – socialinė: tokiuose namuose dažniausiai gyvena pensininkai ar neturtingos šeimos. Užkabinta bronzinė lenta „Paminklas saugomas valstybės“ kol kas praktiškai neatneša jiems nė vieno lito realiai priežiūrai ir remontui, kaip, beje, ir nė vieno rublio anksčiau. Esama tik keleto pirmų valstybės paramos pavyzdžių.
Internet: https://eltalpykla.vdu.lt/1/33859
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12259/33859
Appears in Collections:Meno istorija ir kritika / Art History & Criticism 2005, nr. 1

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Jul 14, 2019

Download(s)

30
checked on Jul 14, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.